SCHOOL |
School of Public Health |
||||
DEPARTMENT |
Department of Public and Community Health |
||||
LEVEL OF STUDIES |
PG LEVEL 7 |
||||
COURSE CODE |
EHCE6 |
SEMESTER |
A Elective |
||
COURSE TITLE |
Theories of Learning and Special Education |
||||
COORDINATOR |
ZAHAROULA TAVOULARI |
||||
TEACHING ACTIVITIES |
TEACHING HOURS PER WEEK |
ECTS CREDITS |
|||
Seminars, Labs |
3 |
4 |
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
Please, add lines if necessary. Teaching methods and organization of the course are described in section 4. |
|
|
|||
COURSE TYPE Background, General Knowledge, Scientific Area, Skill Development |
Scientific Area, Skill Development |
||||
PREREQUISITES:
|
|||||
TEACHING & EXAMINATION LANGUAGE: |
English |
||||
COURSE OFFERED TO ERASMUS STUDENTS: |
ΝΟ |
||||
COURSE URL: |
|
||||
Upon successful completion of the course the student will be able to know:
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Skills
|
|
Search, analysis and synthesis of data and information, ICT Use Adaptation to new situations Decision making Autonomous work Teamwork Working in an international environment Working in an interdisciplinary environment Production of new research ideas |
Project design and management Equity and Inclusion Respect for the natural environment Sustainability Demonstration of social, professional and moral responsibility and sensitivity to gender issues Critical thinking Promoting free, creative and inductive reasoning |
|
|
TEACHING METHOD |
Face to face, Ms Teams |
||||||||||||||||||
USE OF INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY (ICT) |
Eclass. Ppt Ms Teams |
||||||||||||||||||
TEACHING ORGANIZATION The ways and methods of teaching are described in detail. Lectures, Seminars, Laboratory Exercise, Field Exercise, Bibliographic research & analysis, Tutoring, Internship (Placement), Clinical Exercise, Art Workshop, Interactive learning, Study visits, Study / creation, project, creation, project. Etc.
The supervised and unsupervised workload per activity is indicated here, so that total workload per semester complies to ECTS standards. |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Student Evaluation Description of the evaluation process
Assessment Language, Assessment Methods, Formative or Concluding, Multiple Choice Test, Short Answer Questions, Essay Development Questions, Problem Solving, Written Assignment, Essay / Report, Oral Exam, Presentation in audience, Laboratory Report, Clinical examination of a patient, Artistic interpretation, Other/Others
Please indicate all relevant information about the course assessment and how students are informed |
Participation in lectures and seminars is mandatory The language of evaluation is English .
· An intermediate progress study Submitted to e-class 30% · A final study Submitted to e-class 70%
The evaluation criteria are: • scientific methodology • bibliographic documentation
Instructions can be found by students in the e-class
|
· Dweck, C. S., & Master, A. (2008). Self-theories motivate selfregulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 31–51). New York: Taylor & Francis. · Farnham-Diggory, S. (1992). Cognitive processes in education (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins. · Ennemoser, M., & Schneider, W. (2007). Relations of television viewing and reading: Findings from a 4-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 349–368. · Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 9–26). New York: Freeman. · Gagné, R. M., & Briggs, L. J. (1979). Principles of instructional design (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. · Hopkins, S. L., & Lawson, M. J. (2002). Explaining the acquisition of a complex skill: Methodological and theoretical considerations uncovered in the study of simple addition and the moving-on process. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 121–154. · Kail, R. V., & Ferrer, E. (2007). Processing speed in childhood and adolescence: Longitudinal models for examining evelopmental change. Child Development, 78, 1760–1770. · Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row. · Newman, R. S. (2002). What do I need to do to succeed … when I don’t understand what I’m doing!?: Developmental influences on students’ adaptive help seeking. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 285–306). San Diego: Academic Press · Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books. · Rogers, C. R., & Freiberg, H. J. (1994). Freedom to learn (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
· Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2009). Promoting self-determined school engagement: Motivation, learning, and well-being. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 171–195). New York: Routledge.
· Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I’ve got it: A process model of perceived control and children’s engagement and achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 22–32.
|