SCHOOL |
School of Public Health |
||||
DEPARTMENT |
Department of Public and Community Health |
||||
LEVEL OF STUDIES |
PG LEVEL 7 |
||||
COURSE CODE |
EHCE3 |
SEMESTER |
A Mandatory |
||
COURSE TITLE |
Health Education and Promotion: From the Community to the School of Sustainability and Inclusive Education |
||||
COORDINATOR |
KONSTANTINA SKANAVI |
||||
TEACHING ACTIVITIES |
TEACHING HOURS PER WEEK |
ECTS CREDITS |
|||
Seminars , Labs |
3 |
4 |
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
Please, add lines if necessary. Teaching methods and organization of the course are described in section 4. |
|
|
|||
COURSE TYPE Background, General Knowledge, Scientific Area, Skill Development |
Scientific Area, Skill Development |
||||
PREREQUISITES:
|
|||||
TEACHING & EXAMINATION LANGUAGE: |
English |
||||
COURSE OFFERED TO ERASMUS STUDENTS: |
ΝΟ |
||||
COURSE URL: |
|
||||
Learning Outcomes After successful completion of the course, postgraduate students will be able to understand:
environmental issues as active citizens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Skills
|
|
Search, analysis and synthesis of data and information, ICT Use Adaptation to new situations Decision making Autonomous work Teamwork Working in an international environment Working in an interdisciplinary environment Production of new research ideas |
Project design and management Equity and Inclusion Respect for the natural environment Sustainability Demonstration of social, professional and moral responsibility and sensitivity to gender issues Critical thinking Promoting free, creative and inductive reasoning |
|
1. Concept and principles of Environmental Education. 2. Object of Environmental Education. 3. Sustainability and education for sustainable development. 4. Environment and Health indicators of education and culture. 5. Definition of Inclusion in Special Education: basic principles and forms of Inclusion. 6. The concept of experiential learning. 7. Environmental awareness of students through participation in environmental activities. 8. Environmental Education as a methodological “tool” in Special Education. 9. Developing educational environments and learning experiences that enable students to work to ensure quality of life. 10. Sustainable school and human security, human Rights, democracy. 11. Sustainable school and gender equality, cultural diversity, intercultural understanding, 12. Studies presentation-Final Evaluation. 13. Feedback. |
TEACHING METHOD |
Face to face, Ms Teams |
||||||||||||||||||
USE OF INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY (ICT) |
Eclass. Ppt Ms Teams |
||||||||||||||||||
TEACHING ORGANIZATION The ways and methods of teaching are described in detail. Lectures, Seminars, Laboratory Exercise, Field Exercise, Bibliographic research & analysis, Tutoring, Internship (Placement), Clinical Exercise, Art Workshop, Interactive learning, Study visits, Study / creation, project, creation, project. Etc.
The supervised and unsupervised workload per activity is indicated here, so that total workload per semester complies to ECTS standards. |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Student Evaluation Description of the evaluation process
Assessment Language, Assessment Methods, Formative or Concluding, Multiple Choice Test, Short Answer Questions, Essay Development Questions, Problem Solving, Written Assignment, Essay / Report, Oral Exam, Presentation in audience, Laboratory Report, Clinical examination of a patient, Artistic interpretation, Other/Others
Please indicate all relevant information about the course assessment and how students are informed |
Participation in lectures and seminars is mandatory The language of evaluation is English .
· An intermediate progress study Submitted to e-class 30% · A final study Submitted to e-class 70%
The evaluation criteria are: • scientific methodology • bibliographic documentation
Instructions can be found by students in the e-class
|
· UNESCO (2002). Education for Sustainable Development. Retrieved February 8, 2012, · United Nations Environment Programme. (2007). Global environment outlook: Environment for development (GEO4). · Jones, P. (2011). Transformative learning, ecopedagogy and learning ecology: Pathways for social work education. In P. Jones, D. Miles, A. Francis & S. Rajeev (Eds.), Eco-social Justice: Issues, Challenges and Ways Forward. (pp. 1–24). · Higgs, A. L., & McMillan, V. M. (2006). Teaching through modeling: Four schools’ experiences in sustainability education. The journal of environmental education, 38(1), 39-53. · Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986(23-28) · Hopkins, C. A., & McKeown, R. (1999). Education for sustainable development. Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy, 14(4), 25-29. · Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1982). Cognition and environment. New York: Praeger. · Levin, B. (1998). The educational requirement for democracy. Curriculum Inquiry, 28(1), 57-59. · Porter, T., & Córdoba, J. (2009). Three views of systems theories and their implications for sustainability education. Journal of Management Education, 33(3), 323-347. · Hess, D. J., & Maki, A. (2019). Climate change belief, sustainability education, and political values: Assessing the need for higher-education curriculum reform. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 1157-1166. · Somerville, M., & Williams, C. (2015). Sustainability education in early childhood: An updated review of research in the field. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 16(2), 102-117. · Zhang, J., Schmidt, K., & Li, H. (2016). BIM and sustainability education: Incorporating instructional needs into curriculum planning in CEM programs accredited by ACCE. Sustainability, 8(6), 525. · O’Byrne, D., Dripps, W., & Nicholas, K. A. (2015). Teaching and learning sustainability: An assessment of the curriculum content and structure of sustainability degree programs in higher education. Sustainability Science, 10, 43-59. · Jeronen, E., Palmberg, I., & Yli-Panula, E. (2016). Teaching methods in biology education and sustainability education including outdoor education for promoting sustainability—A literature review. Education Sciences, 7(1), 1. · Rosenberg, M. S., Brownell, M., McCray, E. D., Debettencourt, L. U., Leko, M., & Long, S. (2009). Development and Sustainability of School-University Partnerships in Special Education Teacher Preparation: A Critical Review of the Literature. NCIPP Document Number RS-3. National Center to Inform Policy and Practice in Special Education Professional Development. · Rosenberg, M. S., Brownell, M., McCray, E. D., Debettencourt, L. U., Leko, M., & Long, S. (2009). Development and Sustainability of School-University Partnerships in Special Education Teacher Preparation: A Critical Review of the Literature. NCIPP Document Number RS-3. National Center to Inform Policy and Practice in Special Education Professional Development. · Cook, B. G., & Odom, S. L. (2013). Evidence-based practices and implementation science in special education. Exceptional children, 79(2), 135-144. · Veiga Ávila, L., Rossato Facco, A. L., Bento, M. H. D. S., Arigony, M. M., Obregon, S. L., & Trevisan, M. (2018). Sustainability and education for sustainability: An analysis of publications from the last decade. Environmental Quality Management, 27(3), 107-118. · Reid, E., & Horváthová, B. (2016). Teacher Training Programs for Gifted Education with Focus on Sustainability. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(2), 66-74. · Sindelar, P. T., Shearer, D. K., Yendol-Hoppey, D., & Liebert, T. W. (2006). The sustainability of inclusive school reform. Exceptional Children, 72(3), 317-331. · Badilla-Quintana, M. G., Sepulveda-Valenzuela, E., & Salazar Arias, M. (2020). Augmented reality as a sustainable technology to improve academic achievement in students with and without special educational needs. Sustainability, 12(19), 8116. · Vaughn, S., Klingner, J., & Hughes, M. (2000). Sustainability of research-based practices. Exceptional Children, 66(2), 163-171. · Canepa, C. (2007). Sustainable cities: The municipality as a locus of sustainability (Cidades Sustentáveis: O município como lócus da sustentabilidade). São Paulo, Brazil: RCS Publishing House. · Mauerhofer, V. (2008). 3-D sustainability: An approach for priority setting in situation of conflicting interests towards a sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 64(3), 496–506. Retrieved from · Bezerra, M. C. L., & Bursztyn, M. (2000). Science and technology for sustainable development. Brasília: Ministry of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources: Consortium CDS/UNB/Abipti, 2000 (Ciência e Tecnologia para o desenvolvimento sustentável. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis: Consórcio CDS/UNB/Abipti, 2000). · Swanson, H. L. (1999). Instructional components that predict treatment outcomes for students with learning disabilities: Support for a combined strategy and direct instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14(3), 129–140. |